Public infrastructure is crucial for our quality of life, but are we getting the basics right? Is Ireland’s tendering process fit for purpose?
In 2018 over 40 schools, all built by the same construction company, were found to have structural defects which posed safety risks to children and teachers - and cost the Exchequer over €40m.
In the Oireachtas, TDs and senators have raised concerns about how major national infrastructure projects are tendered for. In February 2018, Taoiseach Leo Varadkar told the Dáil that a small number of contractors should never again get a public contract.
He added that the Government would look at whether low-price tenders are allowing some companies to “low-ball”, offering a low tender price to get the contract and then raising their price afterwards. Six months later, the construction company at the centre of the schools scandal, which is being sued by the State, was awarded a major hospital contract.
Low-price tendering also emerged as a key issue during the Cervical Check scandal. And investigations by Noteworthy have shown that price is usually the key or only consideration in how local authorities manage trees in their care.
HELP US INVESTIGATE
We want to investigate how tenders are awarded for major infrastructure projects and explore why price so often trumps quality.
We will examine whether the current system delivers the best short and long-term value for Irish taxpayers, and ask: are there legal impediments (national and European) to changing the laws and regulations around tendering to prevent future issues with public projects?
We want to look into how other EU countries run their tendering processes and explore how The Netherlands has made quality a key consideration for major infrastructure projects.
Have you any information that you think would help this investigation, contact us at [email protected]
If you want to know how your contribution is used, or anything else about how Noteworthy works, you can find out more here.